Legionella Risk Assessment in Laboratory Environments: A Practical Guide

Legionella Risk Assessment in Laboratory Environments: A Practical Guide

As water safety specialists working alongside laboratory professionals, we recognise the unique challenges you face in maintaining safe water systems whilst balancing the demands of complex research environments. Laboratory facilities present distinctive Legionella risks that require specialised assessment approaches beyond standard commercial premises. This guide explores the critical factors in conducting effective Legionella risk assessments specifically tailored to laboratory settings.


Understanding Your Legal Responsibilities in Laboratory Settings


As a laboratory manager, facilities director, or health and safety officer, you operate under specific legal obligations regarding Legionella control. The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 establishes your fundamental duty of care, while the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) requires risk assessments for biological agents—including Legionella bacteria—integrating seamlessly with your existing laboratory COSHH protocols.


The Approved Code of Practice L8 (ACoP L8) and technical guidance document HSG274 provide the practical framework for compliance. While these documents aren't laboratory-specific, their principles must be applied to your unique laboratory water systems to ensure effective Legionella management.


The responsibility chain in laboratory environments typically involves:

  • Laboratory Director/Chief Operating Officer – Ultimate duty holder with legal accountability
  • Facilities/Engineering Manager – Often appointed as the "responsible person" for day-to-day water safety
  • Health and Safety Officer – Ensures integration with broader laboratory safety systems
  • Laboratory Managers – Oversee control measures in specific research or testing areas
  • Appointed Contractors – External specialists conducting assessments or implementing controls


Failure to meet these obligations carries severe consequences, including substantial fines and potential prosecution. For research facilities where reputation and continuity are paramount, the operational impact of non-compliance can be equally significant.


Building Complexity: The Laboratory Environment Challenge


Laboratory facilities present a level of water system complexity rarely encountered in standard commercial buildings. This complexity fundamentally shapes your Legionella risk profile and management requirements.


Complex and Diverse Water Systems


Most laboratories operate multiple water systems with distinct risk profiles:

  • Safety Systems – Emergency showers and eyewash stations experience infrequent use but require immediate availability
  • Research Equipment – Water baths, humidity chambers, and incubators often operate at temperatures ideal for Legionella growth (20-45°C)
  • Cooling Systems – Equipment cooling, environmental test chambers, and process cooling systems may create aerosols
  • Specialist Water Systems – Purified water systems (RO, DI, ultrapure) with complex treatment and distribution networks
  • Standard Building Services – Staff welfare facilities and washrooms with more typical usage patterns


This diversity creates significant management challenges, particularly where systems interconnect or where responsibility is divided between facilities and research teams.


Operational Complexities


Laboratory operations often follow patterns that exacerbate Legionella risks:

  • Variable Usage – Research projects with cyclical water demands create irregular system operation
  • Specialised Procedures – Equipment cleaning and sterilisation requirements affect water usage patterns
  • 24/7 Operations – Continuous processes require constant water availability alongside intermittently used systems
  • Scheduled Downtime – Maintenance windows affecting water system operation


These operational variations make maintaining appropriate water system turnover and temperature control particularly challenging, requiring monitoring programmes tailored to your specific laboratory activities.


Key Risk Factors in Laboratory Settings


Understanding the most common risk factors enables focused assessment and targeted control measures specific to your laboratory environment.


1. Building Infrastructure Challenges

Physical characteristics frequently presenting Legionella risks include:

  • Complex Plumbing Configurations – Laboratory bench services, safety systems, and specialist equipment creating intricate distribution networks
  • Multiple Water Qualities – Separate distribution systems for different water grades increasing system complexity
  • Phased Development – Laboratory evolution over time creating convoluted distribution networks
  • Ageing Infrastructure – Older laboratory buildings with modified plumbing systems presenting legacy issues
  • Accessibility Limitations – Pipework concealed within service ducts or laboratory casework restricting inspection


These physical constraints often require creative engineering solutions specific to laboratory environments, balancing water safety with research operational needs.


2. Temperature Management Challenges

Temperature control forms the cornerstone of Legionella management, yet laboratories present unique challenges:

  • Equipment Heat Output – Laboratory instruments generating heat that affects ambient temperatures
  • Specialised Temperature Requirements – Research processes requiring specific water temperatures that may fall within Legionella growth range
  • Thermal Gain in Service Voids – Inadequately insulated pipework in warm service spaces experiencing temperature increases
  • Variable Flow Rates – Intermittent usage patterns affecting temperature maintenance in distribution systems


Effective temperature management requires comprehensive monitoring across both standard and laboratory-specific systems, with particular attention to sentinel points and equipment-specific water supplies.


3. Operational Management Gaps

Common operational weaknesses identified in laboratory settings include:

  • Fragmented Responsibility – Division between facilities teams and laboratory management creating unclear ownership
  • Inconsistent Monitoring – Irregular checks and incomplete coverage of laboratory-specific systems
  • Inadequate Flushing Regimes – Failure to identify and regularly flush infrequently used outlets, particularly safety showers
  • Record-Keeping Deficiencies – Incomplete documentation and poor integration with laboratory quality systems
  • Research Priority Conflicts – Pressure to maintain research continuity potentially compromising water system management


Addressing these operational issues is often as important as resolving physical infrastructure challenges in laboratory environments.


4. Laboratory-Specific Risks

Research and testing facilities present particular challenges related to specialised equipment and processes:

  • Scientific Equipment Management – Laboratory equipment creating ideal conditions for Legionella growth
  • Process Water Systems – Multiple water qualities with complex treatment and distribution requirements
  • Aerosol-Generating Procedures – Research activities potentially creating water aerosols
  • Maintenance Access Restrictions – Limited access during sensitive research phases
  • Knowledge Silos – Gaps between scientific understanding and water system management expertise


These challenges require coordination between facilities management, laboratory operations, and research leadership to ensure effective control without compromising research activities.


Conducting Effective Risk Assessments: A Practical Approach


A systematic approach tailored to laboratory environments ensures comprehensive coverage of all potential risk factors.


Pre-Assessment Planning

Before beginning the physical inspection, gather comprehensive information about your laboratory water systems:

  • Water System Documentation – Collect schematics, commissioning records, and previous assessments
  • Laboratory Equipment Inventory – Document water-connected equipment with operating parameters
  • Research Process Mapping – Understand water usage in research activities to identify variable patterns
  • Maintenance Records – Review historical monitoring data and remedial actions
  • Laboratory Access Requirements – Plan assessment timing to minimise disruption to critical research


This preparation provides essential context for the assessment and helps identify potential risk areas specific to your operations.


Physical Inspection Elements


A thorough assessment should include detailed inspection of all water system components, with particular attention to:

Standard Building Services

  • Cold water storage and distribution systems
  • Hot water generation and circulation systems
  • Thermostatic mixing valve arrangements
  • Distribution pipework and insulation

Laboratory-Specific Systems

  • Safety showers and eyewash stations – temperature, usage frequency, and drainage
  • Research equipment – water baths, incubators, environmental chambers
  • Cooling systems serving analytical equipment
  • Specialist water systems – purified water, process water, and unique research applications


Comprehensive temperature profiling across these systems provides objective data on system performance, identifying areas where control measures may be inadequate.


Management Review

Beyond physical inspection, assessment of management practices is critical:

  • Written Scheme Evaluation – Comprehensiveness, clarity of responsibilities, and laboratory-specific protocols
  • Monitoring Programme Assessment – Coverage of laboratory-specific systems and record completeness
  • Training Evaluation – Awareness levels among laboratory scientists and competence of maintenance staff
  • Contractor Management – Competence verification and laboratory access protocols


This operational review often reveals management gaps that significantly impact Legionella control effectiveness across complex laboratory organisations.


Implementing Effective Control Strategies


Translating assessment findings into effective control measures requires a structured approach combining engineering solutions and management controls.


Engineering Controls

Physical interventions to reduce Legionella risk in laboratory environments include:

  • System Redesign – Eliminating dead legs and improving circulation in laboratory service distribution
  • Temperature Management – Ensuring consistent hot water storage while addressing laboratory-specific requirements
  • Monitoring Enhancements – Installing remote temperature logging integrated with laboratory management systems
  • Equipment Modifications – Retrofitting temperature control devices to laboratory equipment where feasible


These engineering solutions should be designed with careful consideration of impacts on research or testing activities.


Management Controls

Procedural controls are equally important in managing Legionella risk:

  • Enhanced Monitoring – Comprehensive temperature checking including laboratory-specific systems
  • Flushing Programmes – Scheduled flushing of infrequently used outlets, particularly safety systems
  • Equipment Cleaning – Regular maintenance of water baths, environmental chambers, and humidifiers
  • Clear Responsibility Assignment – Defined roles across facilities and laboratory teams
  • Shutdown Protocols – Specific procedures for research project completions or temporary closures


These operational controls should be fully documented in your written scheme and regularly reviewed for effectiveness and compatibility with laboratory operations.


Conclusion: Building a Culture of Water Safety


Effective Legionella management in laboratory environments requires more than technical compliance—it demands an organisational culture that prioritises water safety alongside research excellence. This involves:

  • Leadership commitment to water safety within the laboratory safety framework
  • Integration of Legionella control with broader laboratory quality management systems
  • Effective communication between scientific, facilities, and safety teams
  • Balanced risk management that addresses water safety without unnecessarily constraining research


By approaching Legionella risk assessment systematically and implementing proportionate control measures, you can create safer working environments for your staff while meeting your legal obligations and maintaining research integrity.


As fellow professionals in water safety management, we recognise the unique challenges laboratory environments present. Through collaboration between water hygiene specialists and laboratory professionals, these challenges can be effectively addressed, ensuring both regulatory compliance and operational excellence in your research facility.

Low-angle view of several modern glass skyscrapers against a clear blue sky.
By James Campbell January 22, 2026
Understand how building complexity affects Legionella risk management in residential blocks and why proactive, system-led assessments are essential for compliance.
Entrance to a modern building,
By James Campbell June 3, 2025
Explore how seasonal occupancy, dense water systems, and mixed building stock influence Legionella risk management in student accommodation.